The reality is that the first approach is common; the second is the exception.
There is much talk about conference or meeting design. One writer uses the analogy of meeting architecture to capture the essence of conference design. If we want to build a house, where would we start? Most people talk to an architect who seeks to understand what is important to you. They would consider your budget and any special needs you have. They then create a concept for the house and then create a blue print to bring the concept to life.
It is a good analogy. A good theme and learning strategy should be much like a blueprint. The traditional role of meeting planners is the contractor or builder. Speakers and suppliers are the materials used to shape the house. Conference participants are the potential residents of the home. In interviews with association and corporate executives who I feel do this well, I often hear issues such as, “It is important to look at our industry two to three years ahead to see what my members need to know to be more successful in the future.”